” Compared to the referent group (≤12 0 μg/L), the subsequent two

” Compared to the referent group (≤12.0 μg/L), the subsequent two exposure groups (12.1–62.0 μg/L and 62.1–148 μg/L) showed non-significantly increased HRs (HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.65, 2.32; HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.71, 2.57, respectively). Trend

http://www.selleckchem.com/products/bmn-673.html analyses were statistically significant, but included exposures to very high arsenic water concentrations (up to 864 μg/L). Similar results for mortality from ischemic heart disease and other forms of heart disease were reported in an assessment of arsenic exposure in urine measured at baseline. In contrast to the multivariate regression analysis adjusted for smoking status, stratification by this covariate showed no clear increasing dose–response relationship mTOR inhibitor below 100 μg/L in never smokers or in past smokers unlike in current smokers ( Chen et al., 2011). Because of the synergistic interaction of arsenic and smoking on CVD and the lack of correction for smoking intensity and duration in this study, the results for never smokers provided clearer evidence of the dose–response relationship between CVD and arsenic and support a POD for an arsenic water concentration of 100 μg/L. Several other cohort or case–control studies emerged from the systematic review as providing supporting information, although with some methodological issues and less complete reporting of analyses and results (Table 2). Overall these studies are consistent

with the endpoint Phosphatidylinositol diacylglycerol-lyase and dose–response evidence from Chen et al. (2011). A population-based retrospective cohort study from Matlab, Bangladesh, (Sohel et al., 2009) reported significantly elevated CVD mortality for arsenic drinking water exposure levels of 150–299 μg/L and higher, but not for lower exposure groups (Table 1). The RR for the 50–149 μg/L group was lower than in Chen et al. (2011), with narrower confidence limits given the larger sample

size (1.16; 95% CI: 0.96–1.40). Sohel et al. (2009) evaluated one exposure metric (arsenic in drinking water) in relation to general categories of CVD mortality and various non-CVD mortality outcomes (cancer, infection, and non-accidental). The study was generally well conducted and involved a large number of subjects in a population that has been studied for several decades, although it lacked information on smoking status and reported considerably less information on methods and study details regarding the potential associations and confounding factors compared to Chen et al. (2011). Other studies involving the HEALS cohort in Araihazar, Bangladesh, include Chen et al. (2006b) (carotid artery intimal–medial thickness among 66 healthy, normotensive individuals), Chen et al. (2013a) (CVD risk and arsenic methylation efficiency in a sub-cohort and in cases included in the cohort of Chen et al. (2011) and Chen et al. (2013b) (heart rhythm in a subset referred for an electrocardiogram) (Table 1). Chen et al.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>