Within NCSP participants there was some variation in HPV prevalence by submitting laboratory, with lower prevalence of HR HPV and HPV 16/18 amongst samples

collected via Norfolk and Norwich laboratory. There was no indication that women included in our selleck study from Norfolk and Norwich had lower risk behaviour than women from other regions, indeed overall they reported higher risk characteristics. There were some indications that the samples from Norfolk and Norwich and from the POPI trial may have suffered from more degradation prior to, and/or inhibition at, testing. Hc2 positivity was lower in samples submitted from Norfolk and Norwich than those from other NCSP laboratories (39% vs. 44%, p = 0.02). For samples from both Norfolk and Norwich and the POPI trial, a higher proportion of hc2 positive samples were LA negative (15% each) and had an RLU/CO in the low range 1.01–3.99 (41% and 37% respectively) than from the other NCSP laboratories (5%, p < 0.001 and 20%, p < 0.001 respectively). Weighting our analysis of 16–24 year olds to the age-structure

and sexual history of the population [18], gave lower prevalence estimates of HPV. The sexually active population-weighted HR HPV prevalence was 32.1% (95% CI 29.5–34.9) based on NCSP samples and 16.0% (95% CI 13.8–18.4) based on POPI data, and for HPV 16/18 was 15.7% (95% CI 13.8–17.9) based on NCSP data and 6.0% (95% CI 4.7–7.6) based on POPI data. Assuming HPV prevalence to be zero in the proportion of the population who reported not having had sexual intercourse (17% of 16–24 year olds [18]), our population-weighted Osimertinib order HR HPV prevalence estimate was 26.8% based on NCSP data and 13.3% based on POPI data, and population-weighted HPV 16/18 because prevalence was 13.1% based on NCSP data and 4.9% based on POPI data. Multiple infections were extremely common in this study. Amongst women with any HPV genotype detected, 75.6%, 81.6% and 64.4% of NCSP 16–24 year olds (group 1), NCSP

under 16 year olds (group 2) and POPI participants (group 3), respectively, had multiple HPV genotypes. In group 1, only a quarter (24.4%) of women with HPV detected had a single type detected: 23.2% had two types, 19.2% had three types, 14.4% had four types and 18.8% had five or more types. Multiple HPV and HR HPV infections were much less common in POPI participants (group 3) than group 1, consistent with the lower risk of infection in the POPI sample. Of women with a vaccine-type HPV (16/18) infection, over half were also infected with a non-vaccine HR type (55.7% (95% CI 50.5–60.8%) in group 1, 65.9% (95% CI 46.7–81.0) in group 2 and 47.1% (95% CI 36.7–57.7) in group 3). The strongest risk factors associated with multiple HR HPV infections were similar to those identified for HR HPV and for HPV 16/18 infections, with multiple HR HPV infection being associated with multiple sexual partners (21% vs.