To this purpose we have studied samples kept in cold storage, proven to yield better microcalorimetric reproducibility when working with single channel calorimeters, as shown in our previous paper [7]. Moreover, the present research aims to illustrate Bioactive Compound Library the most relevant parameters that can be used for the systematic classification of the growth patterns. We emphasize that bacterial strains that make the object of present experiments (Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli) are known to grow in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions [12, 13]. Apart from describing the differences in bacterial thermograms, factors that SN-38 solubility dmso influence the results were also analyzed (oxygen availability and metabolism

and time spent in cold storage). Results and discussion A series of 18 Escherichia coli and 8 Staphylococcus aureus experiments with samples of different volumes (0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 ml) were analyzed. All experiments used the same bacterial concentration and culture medium. All experiments displayed complex

thermal signals. Qualitative (section A) and quantitative (section B) assessments of the thermograms of the two bacterial strains were carried out. To better understand the influence of experimental conditions (oxygen availability and metabolism, time spent in cold storage) on the reported results, additional experiments were devised using physiological saline and mineral (paraffin) oil (section Lazertinib supplier C). For the present stage of analysis, the number of distinctive thermal growth features taken into account was restricted to a minimum. Qualitative analysis As illustrated in Figure  1a, microcalorimetric growth data of the two bacterial strains display a major similarity, as well as several differences between the thermograms, and these findings

are valid for the entire range of sample volumes utilized. Figure 1 Mean thermograms of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus for samples with different volumes. a. Mean thermograms of Escherichia coli (n = 18) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 8) at various volumes of bacterial suspension. The Amine dehydrogenase mean thermograms were obtained averaging the same volume sample runs. Both species exhibit a double-peak behavior but with sizable shape differences. EC – Escherichia coli, SA – Staphylococcus aureus. b. Mean volume-normalized thermograms (expressed as mW/ml bacterial suspension) of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus generated using the Calisto software (HF/V: heat flow/sample volume). The legends display sample volume in microliters. Similarity All recorded thermograms display a 2-peak shape of the thermal signal, for both strains. The sizes of these two peaks exhibit an opposite behavior: the first one increases, while the second one decreases with increase of the sample volume (more evident in the E. coli strain thermograms, Figure  1a). Differences The E.