They are related to and associated with socially constructed values, preferences and interests. But science can help to determine which probable or possible consequences the different options may have (“recursive model”, cf. Weingart, 1999). By answering “if–then” questions and dealing with options of decision making, science can contribute valuably to quality of life, both in terms of “making sense” of a complex environment and practical management. This is particularly so with respect

to coastal sea systems. The body of potentially useful knowledge about the state, the development of the coast, about options for managing the coast, needs a sustainably managed infrastructure. This infrastructure comprises coastal observatories, process and simulation models, tools for dynamical click here and statistical analysis of change, interdisciplinary exchange between the involved disciplines from physics to geology, from engineering to ecology, and socio-economic this website assessment methods for the

integration of relevant data and expert judgments. Useful coastal science must be based on a solid scientific basis. But such a basis is not enough for making coastal science “useful”. The attribute “scientific” is not sufficient for an analysis to gain acceptance in the public and among stakeholders. This is clearly demonstrated by the public debate about the reality of man-made climate change. Instead, scientifically legitimized knowledge is just one form of knowledge, which has to compete with other forms of knowledge in the public domain (von Storch, 2009). Stakeholders,

including the public and media, are often confronted with developments and events in coastal environments that appear hazardous, alarming or promising. Some events are noticed only by a few decision makers, who ask for intensity, spatial and temporal extension, for options, systematic changes and perspectives. In other cases, the Protirelin general public is getting involved, and the issue becomes a legal or political one. In both cases, coastal science is asked for answers, orientation and, when societal interests are involved, provision of a broader context. However, stakeholders have already knowledge what is going on; sometimes this understanding is consistent with scientific insights, but often it is partially or even completely inconsistent. For placing consolidated scientific knowledge in such a “knowledge-environment”, scientific actors need to understand these “other” knowledge about the dynamics, statistics and conditioning of the coastal sea environment. We come back to this issue in the concluding section. For this purpose, we not only need “border organizations”, which identify the utility of scientific achievements for societal needs, but also apprehend societally relevant questions. These border organizations nowadays go often with the concept of “services”.