There may be a genetic component [37] that could impact on an individual’s ability to process certain immunogenic epitopes selleck inhibitor displayed on the vaccine antigens but identifying such contributing factors is challenging. In an attempt to examine the multiplicity of this cross-neutralizing response, we performed antibody enrichment of sera using L1 VLP immobilized onto beads and then tested the eluted

fractions against relevant pseudoviruses. The enrichment of antibody specificities using this approach appears to suggest that cross-reactive antibodies formed a distinct, minority specificity within the vaccine-induced antibody repertoire and were not a consequence of a low affinity interaction of an otherwise predominantly type-specific antibody. The enriched fractions displayed a range of cross-neutralizing antibody Etoposide cell line specificities including those that recognize multiple non-vaccine types and those that recognize

only single non-vaccine types. The cross-neutralizing specificities of the enriched antibody fractions could not have been predicted from the neutralization profile of the source serum. These data suggest that there are multiple immunogenic sites on the surface-exposed domains of the HPV16 L1 protein that share sequence and/or structural homology with other Alpha-9 types. These regions may include the variable loops DE, FG and HI that appear to be common target domains of antibodies generated by natural HPV16 infection [38]. There are several potential shortcomings to this work. Only six sera were evaluated from individuals given Cervarix® vaccine. Caution should therefore be employed when attempting to extrapolate these findings to the majority of HPV vaccinees. Extending this work to include sera from both Cervarix® and Gardasil® vaccinees will support a more robust evaluation. The target antigens for the enriched antibodies were L1L2 pseudoviruses whereas the antigens used for the enrichment Thymidine kinase were L1 VLP which may have introduced some bias in the antibody specificities being measured. This approach was used for two reasons. First, in our hands, the expression and purification

of L1 VLP generates purer populations of antigen than the corresponding purification of L1L2 pseudoviruses. Second, the immunogens used in the HPV vaccines are L1 VLP and so the use of L1 VLP as the immobilized antigen should have allowed capture of the majority of L1-specific antibodies able to recognize a particular HPV type. The recovery of high titer cross-neutralizing antibodies following enrichment on non-vaccine VLP appears to support the maintenance of some VLP conformational integrity following bead immobilisation. If cross-neutralizing antibodies form a tiny minority of the antibodies elicited following HPV vaccination it is possible that their generation and maintenance is more precarious than those of vaccine type antibodies.