The purpose of this study is to propose a robotic colonoscopy for patients infected by highly virulent contagious disease or patients in remote site where medical care is not possible. Methods: A slave robot was developed to hold the colonoscopy instead of endoscopist. This slave robot performs insertion, rolling motion, and two steering motions of the distal end of the flexible endoscope. Also a master robot was developed to teach motions of MK-1775 clinical trial the slave robot. In order to provide the endoscopist with haptic feeling, the insertion force and the rotating torque were measured and feedback
to the master robot. Results: The endoscopist performed the master-slave robotic colonoscopy using a colon phantom. One endoscopist and two engineers participated in the robotic colonoscopy. The task completion time was comparable to conventional colonoscopy and gets decreased as they repeat the test. The haptic function was also helpful to feel the constrained force or torque inside colon. Conclusion: This work proposed a robotic approach for colonoscopy and this robotic device would be effective to perform colonoscopy for patients
in remote sites. Key Word(s): 1. see more Robotic colonoscopy; 2. robotics; 3. colonoscopy; 4. minimally invasive therapy Presenting Author: LORD BYRON CORRAL Additional Authors: CAROLINE LIM, EVAN ONG, ALEXANDER UY, JO ANNE KHOW, CHEN PEN LIM, ODESSA BAYANI, ALMIDA REODICA Corresponding Author: LORD BYRON CORRAL Affiliations: Metropolitan Medical Center, Metropolitan Medical Center, Metropolitan Medical Center, Metropolitan Medical Center, Metropolitan Medical Center, Philippine Children’s Medical Center, Philippine Children’s Medical Center Objective: The presence of air bubbles, mucus and foam in
the stomach and duodenum impairs adequate evaluation of the mucosa. This can result in missed lesions, longer endoscopy procedure time and increased patient discomfort. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at the Metropolitan Medical Center Endoscopy Unit from July to October 2013. Adult patients for upper endoscopy were included. All patients fasted for at least MCE公司 4–6 hours. Patients were consecutively assigned to either Group A: standard fast; Group B: 30 ml of water; and Group C: 30 ml of water plus 1 ml of liquid simethicone. For Groups B and C, all drinks were taken 15–30 minutes before the procedure. During endoscopy, the antrum, the upper gastric body, the lower gastric body, the gastric fundus and the duodenum were evaluated for mucosal visibility using the mucosal visibility score. The volume of water flushed and total procedure time were measured and recorded. Results: A total of 150 patients were included in the study. The gastric and duodenal mucosal visibility was significantly better in the simethicone group (p < 0.001). The volume of water flushed was significantly less in the simethicone group compared with the NPO group (p < 0.05) and the water group (p < 0.01).