Low passage RVFV was used for the animal inoculations as high passage virus in the same cell line may acquire deletions resulting in loss of protein expression, e.g. NSs protein, one of the virulence determinants [25]. In addition, the genomic sequence and protein expression were verified for the virus stock generated in Vero E6 cells as well as for the RVFV stock generated in C6/36 cells [21] and [23]. Based on the obtained data, both sheep and goats appear to be more sensitive to RVFV challenge using virus produced in C6/36 A. albopictus mosquito cells compared to Vero FXR agonist E6 cells when administered subcutaneously. Besides the intuitive reasoning that the use

of mosquito cell derived virus administered subcutaneously more closely mimics the field transmission of RVFV from mosquitoes to ruminants than the use of mammalian see more derived virus or the IV route of challenge,

our previous studies also suggested that the mosquito cell produced virus may be more efficient in initiating the infection via the subcutaneous route. Experimental infection of goats indicated a difference between Vero cell-produced inoculum and the inoculum produced in C6/36 cells at the immune response level [21]. RVFV has been shown to infect monocyte-derived dendritic cells [26]. Current reports on replication of other arboviruses in dendritic cells, the primary target of these viruses in the host skin, indicate that there is indeed a biological difference between virus produced in mammalian cells compared to virus produced in insect cells

in terms of virus–host cell attachment, differential activation of the dendritic cells and evasion of innate immune response such as ineffective IFN-type I induction [27], [28] and [29] resulting in enhanced infectivity of the mosquito-origin virus for mammalian dendritic cells compared to mammalian-origin viruses. RVFV, in addition to presumably different lipid composition of the envelope and different type of glycans on viral glycoproteins, incorporates into the mosquito-cell matured virions also the large 78 kDa protein [23] which could further facilitate the interspecies transmission from mosquitoes to ruminants. We hypothesized that use of insect cell-produced RVFV inoculum administered subcutaneously would lead to consistent and measurable viremia in sheep Rolziracetam and goats, representing a suitable model for veterinary vaccines efficacy studies. On the other hand, use of virus inoculum prepared in mammalian cells administered via mucosal surfaces [30] appears to better mimic human infections acquired through exposure to blood and tissues of ruminants infected with RVFV, and would be well suited for human vaccines efficacy studies. We have also attempted to increase the viremia with different route of re-inoculation at 1 dpi, in case the early immune response is partially suppressed by initial virus replication.