It is known that INF-γ response in peripheral blood might be low in pleural TB patients (Hooper et al. 2009). Therefore, this observation was not surprising. Furthermore, we observed active pulmonary TB in an HCW with a positive first QFT falling into the uncertainty zone and a second QFT clearly above the uncertainty zone. It tells us that when using an uncertainty zone

in serial testing, this should be done with the greatest of care. Uncertainty zone means that spontaneous, clinically irrelevant transgressions over the cutoff are probably predominant, but it does not exclude LTBI or even active TB. Sensitivity studies for QFT using active TB as a surrogate for LTBI suggest that disease activity might be inversely GSK1904529A price related to INF-γ concentration (Menzies et al. 2007; Diel et al. 2010). Therefore, as with the TST, recent exposure and clinical symptoms must be taken into account when interpreting QFT results. Progression

rate for active TB is highest in the first 2 years after exposure. Therefore, preventive treatment is most effective if recent infection is likely. In those with a positive QFT result falling www.selleckchem.com/products/mcc950-sodium-salt.html into the gray zone and recent accidental and unprotected contact with infectious patients or materials, QFT should be repeated EPZ5676 manufacturer within 4 weeks after the first test. If QFT remains positive, preventive treatment should be initiated. If screening was performed because of regular contact with TB patients or infectious

materials and therefore a distinction between old or recent LTBI is not possible, the next routine screening and therefore the next IGRA should be performed in 1 year. This recommendation is based on weak evidence. It should be borne in mind that low concentrations in QFT do not exclude progression to active TB, as was observed in the above-mentioned Japanese prediction study (Yoshiyama et al. 2010). However, disease progression was more likely with higher INF-γ concentrations in QFT. In future, studies are needed that analyze progression risk depending on IGRA results, changes in IGRA results, and exposure history. Despite our increasing knowledge, several key questions about latent infection and reactivation of M. tuberculosis remain unanswered. Particularly, it should be noted that both the TST and the IGRA are designed crotamiton to identify an adaptive immune response against M. tuberculosis, but not necessarily a latent infection. A positive result of currently available diagnostic tests is primarily a measure of an immunologic response to stimulation by mycobacterial antigens that should not, therefore, be equated with the presence of live M. tuberculosis in the human host. The proportion of individuals who truly remain infected with M. tuberculosis after TST or IGRA conversion is unknown. It is also uncertain how long adaptive immune responses toward mycobacterial antigens persist in the absence of live mycobacteria.