Instead, when Hispanic and Caucasian subjects are well matched for obesity,

as in the current study (even MK-1775 concentration as Hispanics had a higher rate of diabetes), differences in hepatic steatosis by MRS are minimal and not overall significant. More importantly, there was no difference in the severity of NASH by histology. Few studies have analyzed the severity of histological disease in subjects of Hispanic versus Caucasian ancestry, but overall the results have been inconsistent. Hispanics either have had more ballooning and Mallory bodies4 and a stronger association with definitive NASH if the NAFLD activity score is ≥5,4, 31 or on the contrary, less advanced fibrosis.7 In part, the inconsistencies could be related to the small proportion of Hispanics included in these cohorts (≈12%-14%). Some studies have compared extremely obese subjects (BMI ≥45 kg/m2)9, 32 but not the more commonly observed overweight PD-1/PD-L1 tumor or mildly obese subject with NASH as reported here. Thus, our observation of similar histology in both ethnic groups is a departure from currently held beliefs but nevertheless highlights the importance of controlling obesity and associated unfavorable metabolic factors in the Hispanic population for the prevention of steatosis and NASH. We examined carefully whether Hispanics had worse insulin resistance at the level of the liver, adipose tissue, and skeletal

muscle. Of note, patients with NASH were very insulin resistant in all target tissues, and plasma FFA was significantly higher compared with healthy control subjects (612 ± 21 versus 456 ± 79 μmol/L; P < 0.05). This finding supports an important role of elevated rates of lipolysis/plasma FFA concentration and lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of NASH.26,

33, 34 Of note, we did not observe any significant difference in either hepatic or adipose tissue insulin resistance among ethnic groups using two different approaches, the fasting EGP and plasma FFA levels in relation to the ambient fasting plasma insulin concentration, respectively, or in the direct response to a 2-hour suppression by low-dose insulin infusion during the euglycemic insulin clamp studies. Therefore, it is likely that clinically relevant differences do not exist MCE公司 between both ethnic groups when well matched for adiposity, even as there was a small trend toward worse hepatic (and even adipose tissue) insulin resistance in Hispanics. A few studies have compared Hispanic subjects with other ethnic groups using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) (fasting plasma glucose × insulin concentration), which is a useful epidemiological tool but a rather crude indicator of hepatic insulin resistance in patients with NAFLD.3, 5, 35 Reports indicate either similar35 or worse3, 5 insulin resistance by HOMA in Hispanics, but again, Hispanics usually had a worse metabolic profile in these studies, as discussed earlier.