Fenoy and Simpson (2014) reported that 0.3% (2/728) of DBS patients demonstrated evidence of postoperative edema, localized to the electrode tip and causing only a transient motor deficit. Arya et al. (2013) reported a higher prevalence of 2.4% for patients undergoing implantation of subdural monitoring electrodes. The risk of postoperative edema is increased by lengthy and/or forceful brain retraction, and intraoperative tissue ischemia, for example due to venous hypertension (Weiss and Post, 2011). Moreover, as described previously,

the complication rate for subdural grid electrodes is higher for large grids, and the area of exposed cortex in visual Inhibitor Library purchase selleck compound cortical implant surgery will be relatively small. We therefore estimate the likely risk to implant recipients to be in the order of 1–2%,

based on the existing literature and the relative simplicity of the implant procedure. Nonetheless, the risk of postoperative swelling after visual cortical electrode array implantation will minimized by the sparing use of brain retraction and unilateral implantation of electrodes. In the unlikely event of clinically relevant postoperative cerebral edema, standard medical management may include pharmacologic interventions such as osmotic agents and steroids where required. In summary, the risk of clinically significant adverse events following visual cortical implant surgery is likely to be low. This statement is supported by the existing neurosurgical literature, as well as the growing number of reports describing uneventful temporary (House et al., 2006 and Waziri et al., 2009) and longer-term (Collinger et al., 2013 and Hochberg et

al., 2012) implantations of high-density electrode arrays into human cerebral cortex. A key non-surgical element to the postoperative care of visual cortical implant recipients will be the provision of ongoing, subject-specific psychological support. This approach has Buspirone HCl been taken by other groups following implantation of a cortical motor neuroprosthesis (Collinger et al., 2014) and retinal visual prostheses (Peters et al., 2013). Both groups describe the involvement of psychologists throughout the life-cycle of their respective studies, helping study participants adjust to the ongoing demands of participating in a high-profile research project, along with ensuring outcome expectations and wellbeing were carefully monitored throughout. We anticipate this will become a standard element in the postoperative management of cortical visual prosthesis recipients also. After implantation and recovery, a significant amount of testing will be required to establish the most effective stimulation parameters for each individual electrode.