1063/1.3573389]”
“We present the case of a 14-year-old girl who was admitted to the hospital with the complaint of horizontal diplopia for 48 hours. Z-IETD-FMK concentration Initially, she was diagnosed with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. During hospitalization she developed fever, macular facial rash, and chest pain, and because of abnormal laboratory findings the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus was established. She received immunomodulatory therapy, a combination of corticosteroids, and intravenous infusions of the monoclonal antibody rituximab, which augmented her clinical improvement. Intracranial hypertension secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus is a rare manifestation, especially as a presenting symptom. In

addition, the fact

that the patient developed an aggressive form of systemic lupus erythematosus during the initial period of hospitalization for idiopathic intracranial hypertension is also uncommon. Moreover, to our knowledge, we are not aware of any published case reports of intracranial hypertension secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus that was treated with rituximab.”
“Purpose: To investigate the concordance of the Durie-Salmon staging system with the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system in monoclonal plasma cell disease.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, with waiver of informed consent. Lesions in 403 untreated patients (age range, 21-83 years) with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) (n = 84), solitary plasmacytoma (n = 17), amyloid light-chain amyloidosis (n = 12), and multiple myeloma (MM) (n Compound C = 290) were first staged on the basis of the classic Durie-Salmon staging system, which included conventional radiography. After examination with whole-body (WB) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, lesions in these patients were, in addition, staged by using the

Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system. Bone marrow infiltration pattern MRT67307 research buy and focal lesions described as intramedullary, transcortical, and soft-tissue lesions, were assessed. The staging levels of both systems were compared.

Results: Of 84 patients with MGUS, lesions in 33 (39%) would have been staged differently with Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system when compared with Durie-Salmon staging system (stage I MM [37%], stage II MM [0%], and stage III MM [2%]). All 17 patients with plasmacytoma showed additional focal lesions or a diffuse infiltration leading to a classification as stage I MM (76%), stage II MM (12%), or stage III MM (12%) with Durie-Salmon PLUS. Of the 149 patients with stage I MM, lesions in 81 (54%) would have been staged differently with the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system. Of the 21 patients with stage II MM, lesions in 19 (91%) would have been staged differently with Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system when compared with the Durie-Salmon staging system. Of the 120 patients with stage III MM, lesions in 72 (60%) would have been staged differently with the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system.