Figure 4 msmeg0615 (pr1) promoter activity.

β-galactosidase activity of cultures grown in Sauton medium in the presence of varying divalent metal ions. The values, expressed as nanomoles of o-nitrophenol-β-D-galactopyranoside Ruxolitinib converted to o-nitrophenol min-1 mg-1 of protein, represent the average and the standard deviation of three independent clones. * indicates that values are significantly different from the control value (p < 0.01). 5'-RACE and transcriptional analysis of pr2 Cluster 3 gene organization seems to exclude the presence of internal promoter regions with one exception; the distance between the ppe (rv0286, msmeg0619) and esxG (rv0287, msmeg0620) coding regions suggested the presence of an internal putative promoter upstream of M. tuberculosis esxG and the corresponding homologous msmeg0620 gene (Figures 1, 2B). The short rv0287-rv0288 and msmeg0620-msmeg0621 intergenic regions were not analyzed, as the two genes had previously been reported to be cotranscribed [18]. To determine SAHA HDAC nmr whether the putative pr2 promoter was present, we amplified the rv0286-rv0287 and the msmeg0619-msmeg0620 intergenic regions (Figure 2B) and cloned them into pMYT131. The

recombinant plasmids were MK-0518 clinical trial transformed into M. smegmatis, and β-galactosidase activity was measured. As shown in Figure 5, the data suggest the presence of an alternative promoter just upstream of the esx genes, as enzymatic activity, particularly for the msmeg0619-msmeg0620 intergenic region was significantly higher than that measured in the control culture (M. smegmatis transformed with the empty vector). The data regarding M. tuberculosis are less clear, since detectable promoter activity was low. Figure 5 msmeg0620 (pr2 MS) and rv0287 (pr2 MT) promoter activity. β-galactosidase activity of msmeg0620 and rv0287 (pr2) in M. smegmatis cultures grown in 7H9 medium at mid-log phase.

The value find more represents the average and the standard deviation of three independent clones. * indicates that values are significantly different from the control value (p < 0.01). To better define promoter sequences, we performed 5′ RACE experiment. The transcriptional start site, indicated with an arrow in Figure 2B, mapped at -34 upstream of the msmeg0620 translational start codon. Although no SigA promoter consensus sequence was observed in the upstream region, we could found hypothetical -10 and -35 sequences that resembled those reported as to be possibly recognizable by M. tuberculosis SigH factor [19]. We did not identify any pr2 promoter sequence in M. tuberculosis, as the 5′ RACE experiments were unsuccessful. Quantitative PCR on msmeg0615 and msmeg0620 genes and their homologs in M. tuberculosis M. smegmatis mc2155 was grown at different growth phases and in different stress conditions; RNA was extracted, retrotranscribed and used in relative quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments.