In seven studies, (22%) participants BIBF 1120 chemical structure were asked questions on their health as well as on their work. In four studies, participants were explicitly asked about the work relatedness of their illness or symptoms (Mehlum et al. 2009; Bolen et al. 2007; Lundström et al. 2008; Dasgupta et al. 2007). In 25 studies, the self-report was compared with the assessment by a medical expert (e.g., physician, registered nurse, or

physiotherapist). In 7 studies, self-report was compared with the results of a clinical test (e.g., audiometry, pulmonary function tests, skin prick tests, blood tests). Findings In additional Table 6, an overview is presented of all 32 studies with the results of the comparison of self-reported work-related illness and expert assessment of work-related diseases. Table 6 Results on comparison of self-reported work-related illness and expert assessment of work-related diseases   Reference Health status Type of self-report Predictive values Agreement Remarks 1 Descatha et al. (2007) MSD Upper Extremities Symptoms Complete analysis

including all disorders at examination 1993–1994 (1757) Complete analysis Prevalence based on self-report > prevalence based on clinical examination 1993–1994 k = 0.77 (95% CI 0.74–0.80) Repetitive task Survey (RtS) 1996–1997 k = 0.57 (95% CI 0.50–0.64) SE = 0.94 [0.93, 0.95]; SP = 0.81 [0.78, 0.84]; PPV = 0.91; NPV = 0.88 Agreement moderate to high Complete analysis below including all disorders at examination PF477736 datasheet 1995–1996 (598) SE = 0.82 [0.78, 0.86]; SP = 0.78 [0.71, 0.84]; PPV = 0.90; NPV = 0.64 Sensitivity moderate to high, specificity moderate, PPV high, NPV low to moderate Restrictive analysis with six disorders JNJ-26481585 in vivo included 1993–1994 (1757) Restrictive analysis 1993–1994 k = 0.52 (95% CI 0.48–0.55) 1995–1996 k = 0.45 SE = 0.97 [0.95,

0.98]; SP = 0.57 [0.53, 0.60]; PPV = 0.66; NPV = 0.95 (95% CI 0.38–0.52) Agreement moderate to high Restrictive analysis with six disorders included 1995–1996 (598) SE = 0.87 [0.82, 0.90]; SP = 0.58 [0.52, 0.64]; PPV = 0.68; NPV = 0.80 Sensitivity high, specificity low, PPV low, NPV high 2 Descatha et al. (2007) MSD Upper Extremities Symptoms Extensive (including symptoms about last week and last year) Extensive Prevalence based on self-report > prevalence based on clinical examination Standard NMQ: k = 0.22 (95% CI 0.19–0.23) Agreement low Pays de Loire Survey (PdLS) Standard quest. SE = 0.83 [0.79, 0.87]; SP = 0.81 [0.79, 0.83] Sensitivity moderate, specificity moderate Restrictive (pain scale rating (PS) and symptoms during examination) Restrictive NMQ, GS > 0: k = 0.44 (95% CI 0.40–0.48) NMQ, GS > 0: SE = 0.82 [0.78, 0.86]; SP = 0.82 [0.81, 0.84] NMQ, GS ≥ 2: k = 0.45 (95% CI 0.41–0.49) Agreement moderate NMQ, GS ≥ 2; SE = 1.00 [0.99, 1.00]; SP = 0.51 [0.49, 0.53] Sensitivity moderate to high, specificity low to moderate 3 Juul-Kristensen et al.