To avoid these technical limitations and directly determine whether CR3 and or CR4 are critical for the development and progression of ECM, we used mice deficient in these receptors. We compared susceptibility and clinical severity of CR3−/− (23), CR4−/− (24) and wild-type mice in Plasmodium berghei ANKA-induced ECM as previously check details described (25). All mice used in this

study were on the C57BL/6 background. For these studies, P. berghei ANKA was maintained by passage in BALB/c mice (26). ECM was induced by injecting mice i.p. with 5 × 105 PbA-infected RBCs. Peripheral parasitemia was monitored on day 6 postinfection by Giemsa-stained, thin-blood smears. Mice were monitored twice daily for clinical signs of neurologic disease using the following scoring scale: 0, asymptomatic; 1, symptomatic (ruffled fur); 2, mild disease (slow righting); 3, moderate disease (difficulty righting); 4, severe disease (ataxia, seizures, coma); 5, Doxorubicin price dead. Mice observed having seizures were given a score of 4 regardless of other clinical signs of disease. Moribund animals were scored 4·5 and humanely sacrificed. Mice were classified as having ECM

if they displayed these symptoms between days 6 and 9 post-infection, had positive thin-blood smears and, had a corresponding drop in external body temperature or succumbed to infection. We found that CR3−/− and CR4−/− mice did not survive significantly longer than wild-type mice (P > 0·05, Log-rank test; Figure 1a,d) and that all three groups of mice succumbed to infection at the same rate. Disease severity in CR3−/− and CR4−/− mice was identical compared with wild-type mice and corresponded well to survival (Figure 1b,e). Interestingly, peripheral parasitemia was significantly elevated in CR3−/− (P = 0·0028, unpaired Student’s t-test), but not in CR4−/− mice compared with wild-type mice (Figure 1c,f). The latter results suggest a minor role for CR3 in parasite clearance, but not in survival or disease severity. The absence of an altered

disease phenotype in CR3−/− and CR4−/− mice raised questions regarding the role of other β2-integrin adhesion molecules in ECM. Previous studies have reported ever minimal differences in the course of ECM through day 10 in CD11d−/− (αDβ2) mice (27) not unlike what we report here for CR3 and CR4. In contrast, LFA-1 (CD11a, (αLβ2), also a member of the β2-integrin family, is thought to play a key role in the development of ECM based on studies demonstrating significant protection from the development of ECM on treatment with anti-LFA-1 antibodies (21,22,28). To our knowledge, no one has directly assessed the role of LFA-1 in ECM using LFA-1−/− mice to verify these reports. Therefore, we performed ECM using LFA-1−/− mice (29).